tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16180073.post6780607808212029881..comments2024-01-11T04:32:02.732-05:00Comments on O-Poker: Where do you hope to be in....?/ QQ Follow upLoopyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10691361649180193547noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16180073.post-84963041932154757002008-04-10T18:09:00.000-05:002008-04-10T18:09:00.000-05:00i really don't mind the fold at all. as alan said...i really don't mind the fold at all. as alan said, you only have a dollar in the pot and this could turn into a big one. <BR/><BR/>i play QQ/JJ/TT almost the same way. i'm not willing to play a big pot with those hands unless i flop a set or i'm 99% certain i'm up against some donkeroo who's overplaying their hand. but, as you know i'm playing full ring. much diff game.smokkeehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13494763585388001041noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16180073.post-31895359572655013352008-04-09T12:51:00.000-05:002008-04-09T12:51:00.000-05:00The QQ hand gets more interesting the more I think...The QQ hand gets more interesting the more I think about it.<BR/><BR/>At 1/2, and counting your reads, it looks like +ev to get away. I have my nights where I'm looking to avoid the TPTK fights, to set mine and get into hands cheap, and at 1/2 that 3-bet means something most times. Plus, I hate that you are out of postion, and still have 1-to act, so calling 16bb sucks, and 4-betting 50BB into 2 nits can't be profitible. I pay em off anyway cause that is how I role at 1/2.<BR/><BR/>at 2/4, I think a button 3-bet is an automatic 4-bet with QQ.<BR/><BR/>at 5/10, I put my over aggression back in my pants and make a crying fold if the reads stay the same.Eric a.k.a. Bone Daddyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05956275234278494118noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16180073.post-87876888867854433112008-04-09T12:17:00.000-05:002008-04-09T12:17:00.000-05:00Peaker plays full ring. 6 max is a completely diff...Peaker plays full ring. 6 max is a completely different animal. <BR/><BR/>Having said that, you only had $1 in the pot so folding isn't grossly wrong. I don't know what the actual EV calc would be but even a tight/solid player in a 6 max game would have AQ+ and TT+ in the reraising range and I think that's ubertight. <BR/><BR/>Ok, I just looked it up. Assuming the reraising range of the player is AA-TT, AK, and AQ, QQ has 55% equity against that range.Alan aka RecessRampagehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00544791207717813141noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16180073.post-7328174885624879032008-04-09T12:00:00.002-05:002008-04-09T12:00:00.002-05:00You played it how I would play it, but I'm a bit n...You played it how I would play it, but I'm a bit nitty sometimes as well. But, really, would a guy play a hand that hard with JJ in a cash game? If you didn't see him as an aggressive player, my answer is no. Much more often than not, I put a guy like that on K-K or A-A and just shrug in the few times that he's making a good play. In the long run you save money there, I think.<BR/>Good fold.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08837529956827141862noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16180073.post-52984279357103408192008-04-09T12:00:00.001-05:002008-04-09T12:00:00.001-05:00This comment has been removed by the author.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08837529956827141862noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16180073.post-80480145552141293502008-04-09T12:00:00.000-05:002008-04-09T12:00:00.000-05:00This comment has been removed by the author.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08837529956827141862noreply@blogger.com